[x]

deviantART

 

Sad state of stock photography

Mon Jan 14, 2008, 2:07 PM
  • Mood: Rant
To put it simply, the stock photography offered on this site blows hardcore. This shit sucks. It is absolutely impossible to find anything of worth in the stock section of this website. Let me elaborate and give examples to back up my claim.


Stock photography, by its nature, is meant to be used by others. It is not a medium where one is supposed to take low-resolution pictures of themselves in a mirror using terrible lighting and some bullshit props or a use a bedsheet as a toga. It is not a medium where the goal is to be as creative as possible. The goal is to take photos that have the greatest range of usability. Here are a few things to keep in mind.

1. Low resolution (and I mean anything below 2048x1536) is pointless, unless you want to specifically limit your photos to be used on the internet. That's all well and good if you do, but bigger is always better. You can resize down easily, morons, you can't just resize up the same way. This is shit you should know already, but for some reason I still find 800x600 and 1024x768 images littering the stock galleries.

2. If you are ugly, then take pictures of someone else. Nobody wants to use a wildebeast in an advertisement or a god damn Bigfoot-looking thing in a piece of art. And if you are either one of those two, you are surely well aware of it, and if you still feel the need to take nude shots, then I may feel the need to projectile-vomit on my keyboard and then beat you to death with a rolled-up paper bag. There is a reason your photos only get 12 views. Its because no one wants to look at you. Take a hint. So please save me some money and what little innocence I may have left.

3. Do not take a picture of yourself. Especially using a mirror or reflective object of any kind whatsoever. This includes holding a camera at arms length and blindly hitting a button. If you are so conceited that you can't find anyone else worth photographing, or you have to see yourself immortalized in pixels to have any self worth, then stop taking photographs altogether. You are doing more harm than good to the community and your bullshit photos will merely take up space on DA's servers that could best be used elsewhere.

4. Use a high-contrast background. When you are shooting a subject, whether it be a macro shot of an object or a portrait of someone, (remember, other than yourself) a high-contrast background is key. The only exception is for when the type of shot demands no background at all. (Landscape/scenery, underwater, animals, plants, etc.) This allows the artists who are going to use your work, like me, an easier time with it.

5. And take more than one shot. I don't mean photograph the same thing several times and upload them all together, with the only thing being different the timestamp from the camera in the bottom corner. Move around. Rotate. Take from all angles. And if you are someone described in #2, and have so far ignored #3, then one shot is fine, and I'd appreciate it if you kept that one to yourself too. I have seen pages upon pages upon mountains of pages with more than 10 shots of the same angle of the same subject with the same lighting, and the only thing different is.... well, there really isn't a difference. They just all look the same and the photographer didn't bother to cut out or edit any photos or spend any more effort than dumping a whole gigabyte memory card onto DA's server all at once.

6. Keep the subject of the photos in the middle, as in, not going off the borders. Any image editor anywhere in the world can use the crop feature. Hell, even MS Paint can do that. This also goes back to #1. Shoot as large as possible, and at as high quality as possible, and keep the subject in the middle. I am more than happy to crop images on my own, much more than I like scouring millions of photos on DA.

7. If I seem too critical, or if one of you wants to tell me that your stock photographs are your business, then I have this to say. Fuck off. Ninety percent of the stock on this site is crap. The good stock artists don't submit much, because they take the time necessary to produce really great work. Its the people with too much time, an itchy shutter-finger, and not enough taste that are the ones you see with stock galleries numbering in the hundreds (or thousands, in a few cases) They are the people who care so little about producing good work that they rape this site submitting everything that they can in the hopes that quantity will make up for a severe lack of quality.


And now, the part where people start to get mad. This is where I call out stock artists that suck, and give credit to the ones that are good.

=RLDStock She is just not that good. I browsed over 35 pages of this gallery and found one solitary photo that I thought might have some usefulness. Ironically, it was on the profile page as the featured deviation.

[link] This is not it. This is typical of what you find here.
[link] This is it. She rightfully got credit for this shot. Its excellent.

*mjranum-stock This guy is excellent. He's got the formula down wonderfully. No wonder he's got 750k page views.

*FaeDuSoliel
[link] This is stock!?!? WTF?


That's it. I'm sick. It'll take me less time to work enough and by my own camera, hire a model, and take the shots I need myself, than it will to find something even half decent on here.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

Amen to that! I think most of dA is going downhill these days, with the Sonic / Naruto / Pokemon / whole anime thing. It's nice to see people still have an eye for detail and aren't afraid to speak their mind.

I support everything you've said here, and I really hope that the quality of the work increases ;D

--
Social Networking 2.0? | Fave a journal? | dC | CSS
This is what happens when certain founders of DA get booted by an incompetent. This is not supposed to be a site where mid-highschool no-talent clowns go to make themselves feel good by posting as much as they can. Someone ought to tell them that just cause they can doodle on a paper and they feel left out of the popular group at school, that doesn't make them artists. This site is for the pushing of art. Not to cater to a fan-boy's ego.

Sorry, I touched on a few other things there that are starting to annoy me about this site. I've been here for almost 7 years, and back then the site was different. People cared about what they submitted.


Ah well. As it happens with all good things, its become a corporation and DA has lost sight of its purpose for being here in the first place.

--
[link]

Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall. Torque is how far you drag it.
Well every artist has to start out somewhere I suppose. My first deviation was a crappy wallpaper (800x600) made in The GIMP, using Microsoft Word Clipart. Not a glamorous beginning, but a beginning nonetheless. Despite that, I've seen people who after years of drawing, haven't improved or STILL draw Sonic, Naruto, Anime, whatever. I at least try and expand my horizons, having dabbled in pixel-art, coding (my fortè;), space-scapes (a pretty piss-poor attempt if you ask me, but that's how all people start off ;)), wallpapers and stuff.

Still, I think dA has moved into a rather deep rut, and it's up to the "good" artists to keep chugging along and show these artistic 'n00bs' what they're made of (I refrain from referring to myself because I feel I'm a shit artist :XD:)

--
Social Networking 2.0? | Fave a journal? | dC | CSS
Agreed, every artist has to start out somewhere, just take a look at my gallery to see the lowly depths I came from. But I've come far since then. I don't submit things here very often because most of what I do now is freelance for clients and experiments for myself, rather than producing wallpapers and such for the mainstream. I highlighted on one person though in this journal entry, and they have a gallery of almost 1,800 images, and I challenge anyone to find a use for a single one of them. That person is the epitome of a standard stock photographer on DA, and "artists" like that are the ones that bring DA down, never seeking to better themselves, just submitting tons and tons of the same crap photography time and time again. Its not just limited to stock photography, either. There's several fairly common-name people on DA that I can name as doing the same thing, they're just better at being a one-trick-pony than most. Maybe one can call me a hypocrite, because I stuck with a particular style for so long. Fine. But anything I submitted, I did to better myself, and DA just happened to get a piece of it. Certain pieces, I submitted variations of, so that I could judge peoples' reactions, but nowhere did I do it just to make my name bigger. This site needs to remember its roots.

--
[link]

Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall. Torque is how far you drag it.
That isn't just confined to stock photography, it's site wide in just about every gallery known to DA.

I agree especially when I have to sift through DA like panning for a pebble of gold.

DA has already crossed the line of 'is this Flickr' or some such thing.

I'm almost sure DA use to have something that allowed you to browse by resolution several years ago, WTF ever happened to that? Some changes are good but others are just completely ass backwards.

--
Inception8 Renderosity store - [link]
These are the reasons that the old-timers like us tend to not stick around.

--
[link]

Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall. Torque is how far you drag it.
I hear ya. I've noticed quite a number of people have disappeared off the map for whatever reasons that probably has to do with personal DA issues similar to yours. I have the same issues that I think most have and I try to make the best of it. That's all we can do really. It's just going to become more and more of the same thing.

I think it was always on it's way to being what it is today just less of it. Now it's too much.

--
Inception8 Renderosity store - [link]
You really need a warning on the *FaeDuSoliel link because that stuff is disgusting.
Well personally, I think that some of the stock you listed, could MAYBE be used as drawing references, so artists can get materials flowing correctly, facial expressions, poses and stuff, but you're right. It's just standard stuff that not for "everyone" (and by that, I mean more than a few here and there) could use.

I bet if you ask these people why they don't seek to better themselves, they might tell you that they don't have the money, they don't know the right techniques or they're happy with what they're doing (That's the standard reply to anyone who isn't the world's best artist. A true artist is never happy with what they're doing and continually improves, as I'm sure you've realised)

Sticking with one style is quite alright, as long as your skills are good. I've seen people upload website designs here. They all follow common themes or styles, but it's still unique enough to draw a crowd (whether that's their intention or not, isn't really important :XD:).

These days I'm doing my best to ignore what dA has become. I use it to post my work, do a bit of socialising, check out photography tips (by browsing by the popular category, rather than "newest") and have started to use this site for posting stuff from my portfolio (until I can shuffle everything over to my new CMS system on my website :XD:)

--
Social Networking 2.0? | Fave a journal? | dC | CSS

Journal History

Site Map